'Lee Jung-jae's Largest-Shareholder Artist Company Partially Prevails Again in 4.4 Billion-Won Damages Suit

[Financial News] Artist Company, whose largest shareholder is actor Lee Jung-jae, partially prevailed again on appeal in a damages lawsuit it filed against Kim Dong-rae, the former CEO of drama production company RaemongRaein, now Artist Studio.
According to legal sources on the 12th, the Seoul High Court's Civil Division 16-2 recently issued a judgment partially in favor of the plaintiffs, the same as the first trial, in a lawsuit filed by Artist Company, Lee Jung-jae and other investors against Kim Dong-rae.
The court ordered Kim Dong-rae to pay approximately 2.779 billion won to Artist Company, approximately 749 million won to Lee Jung-jae, and a combined approximately 899 million won to the two remaining plaintiffs. The total amount was approximately 4.4 billion won.
The dispute arose after Artist Company became RaemongRaein's largest shareholder by participating in a paid-in capital increase in March 2024. A conflict emerged between the investors and Kim Dong-rae, the company's founder, over the company's management direction.
Artist Company filed the lawsuit in June of the same year, claiming that Kim Dong-rae had failed to meet the investors' demands and was blocking their participation in management. Kim Dong-rae's side, however, argued that Artist Company had sought to use the investment funds for purposes different from those originally planned, including pursuing the acquisition of a listed entertainment company whose shares were suspended from trading.
The first trial court found that Kim Dong-rae had breached his obligations under the investment agreement. The agreement required all existing registered directors and the auditor to resign, while also requiring the existing business divisions to be managed diligently until new directors were appointed.
The court also rejected Kim Dong-rae's argument that the use of the investment funds had been restricted. It found no evidence that the agreement limited the use of the funds at the time it was signed or that the parties had implicitly agreed to such a restriction. Accordingly, the court ruled that Kim Dong-rae had to pay the investors damages equivalent to the contractual penalty and litigation costs.
On appeal, Kim Dong-rae's side argued that the provision requiring the existing directors and auditor to resign constituted an ancillary obligation. Therefore, it claimed that he could not be held liable for nonperformance merely because he had failed to fulfill it.
The appellate court focused on the fact that securing management control of RaemongRaein was expressly stated as the purpose of the agreement. Since gaining control of the board was the basic means of securing management control, the court determined that the resignation of the existing directors and auditor constituted a core contractual obligation and upheld the first-trial ruling.


[email protected] Choi Doo-sun Reporter